<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: People Magazine Recreates Art&#8230; Badly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arthistory.we-wish.net/2008/12/11/people-magazine-recreates-art-badly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arthistory.we-wish.net/2008/12/11/people-magazine-recreates-art-badly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea</title>
		<link>http://arthistory.we-wish.net/2008/12/11/people-magazine-recreates-art-badly/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthistory.we-wish.net/?p=294#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>Hi Donovan.  Great question, and I&#039;m embarrassed that I did not write the issue number in the article!  Unfortunately, I&#039;ve recycled the magazine since then, but I believe it&#039;s from mid December -- I would guess for the week of Dec. 15 (that Monday).  I hope that helps, and I apologize for not having more concrete information for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Donovan.  Great question, and I&#8217;m embarrassed that I did not write the issue number in the article!  Unfortunately, I&#8217;ve recycled the magazine since then, but I believe it&#8217;s from mid December &#8212; I would guess for the week of Dec. 15 (that Monday).  I hope that helps, and I apologize for not having more concrete information for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donovan Whistler</title>
		<link>http://arthistory.we-wish.net/2008/12/11/people-magazine-recreates-art-badly/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>Donovan Whistler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthistory.we-wish.net/?p=294#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>Hi Chelsea,

Can I ask which issue of People magazine this article was published in, I take it sometime in 2008?
Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chelsea,</p>
<p>Can I ask which issue of People magazine this article was published in, I take it sometime in 2008?<br />
Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Benford</title>
		<link>http://arthistory.we-wish.net/2008/12/11/people-magazine-recreates-art-badly/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Benford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthistory.we-wish.net/?p=294#comment-529</guid>
		<description>Ugh - it&#039;s hard to know where to start addressing this abomination! This &quot;iconic female image&quot; is iconic only of ignorance about Whistler and the splendor of his original work.  The tragedy -- other than the widespread circulation of &quot;People&quot; - is the scant acknowledgement given to his brilliance!

I&#039;m with you -- &quot;What?!??&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh &#8211; it&#8217;s hard to know where to start addressing this abomination! This &#8220;iconic female image&#8221; is iconic only of ignorance about Whistler and the splendor of his original work.  The tragedy &#8212; other than the widespread circulation of &#8220;People&#8221; &#8211; is the scant acknowledgement given to his brilliance!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you &#8212; &#8220;What?!??&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

